"Geesi dhereb kuma jiro"

Monday, January 4, 2010

The Journey of a Pakistani from a Muslim to an Ex-Muslim

By Muhammad A. Khan

Introduction This is the story of an Ex-Muslim from Pakistan. Born a Muslim, I am living in the Muslim community observing and contemplating on various dimensions of the inhabitants of Pakistan: their Islamic culture, their styles of living, and their way of commerce. The most important aspect that intrigues me is the inclination of Pakistanis towards Islam. In this respect it is doubtless that Pakistani culture is very different from the rest of the world. With about 170 million people, ninety-five percent of whom are Muslims, Pakistan is an Islamic state. The number of rural Pakistanis far outweighs the number of urban dwellers. Pakistan has only four provinces, but more than thirty spoken languages. Urdu is the national language, and English is a Secondary language. The 1973 constitution of Pakistan has declared that Arabic will also be a secondary language of Pakistan. Despite such a constitutional measure, still in 2009, Arabic has no place in this country. I would safely say that more than ninety percent of Pakistanis, including me, do not understand Arabic; neither do we speak nor write it properly. Truly, this proves the heart of a Pakistani is anything but Arabic. Just like any other Islamic country such as Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia, Islam is the only dominant religion in Pakistan. Bitterly condemned and despised, religions other than Islam have very little place in these countries. These Islamic states attempt to adopt their way of life according to Quran and Sunnah. In Pakistan, Sunnis are a majority with about seventy-five percent of population. Shias are the second largest religious community in Pakistan.

My beliefs towards Allah, Islam and Muhammad before becoming an Ex-MuslimAs stated above, I was, by birth a Muslim, and at an early age we were taught the basic principles of Islam. Allah was everything to me. I considered him the most almighty. He was omnipresent and I thought he was watching us all the time. He knows every action of us; even what we think and intend, he is aware of that. We live happily or sadly, that's all from his will. We were taught that he loves us very much and he is our only protector. He possesses such a mighty power that we could never even think of. Like every Muslim, I had a great reverence and adoration for Muhammad. To me, he was a hero, a superman, the only savior, infallible, protector, merciful, and the most remarkable personality on earth that can never be compared to anyone else. I could never dare to conjecture that Muhammad could ever commit sins or do mistakes. Had I ever questioned the honor and integrity of Muhammad, I started to blame my sub-conscience. I often thought that I was one of the luckiest men in the world that I was born a Muslim, and we Muslims are the only inhabitants of Jannat, where, there are hoors (pretty virgins) and vine (wine) with exclusive flavors. Thus, around the age of 20, I started to offer prayers, not only five times a day, but also extra nawafil (extra prayers that are not compulsory), just being greedy to have more hoors in jannat. I believed that the more we pray the prettier our hoors will be. Sadly, due to this self-deception and ignorance, I neglected and overlooked the pretty virgins in this world. Knowing that every non-Muslim, no matter how righteous or good, will go to hell, I often pondered about them, and the terrible fate that awaits them. Pitying them, I wished all non-Muslims to become Muslims, so that they could also join us in jannat. Because I learned that the only method for the success in the hereafter was to believe in one Allah and in the affirmation of the finality of Muhammad the (so-called) prophet. I firmly believed that Muhammad was the next great personality after Allah. My reasons of becoming an Ex-MuslimNow, I will discuss about the false conception of Muslims about Islam, Allah, Quran and Muhammad .I found the good reason to leave Islam when I discovered the gross irrationalities and logical errors Muslims make about the supremacy of Islamic faith. Here I shall illustrate my view points, and it is up to the readers to decide if I had been right or wrong a) Allah:Who is this Allah? This legitimate question is very common, but there is no satisfactory answer. Many great thinkers have succinctly discussed about the origin of Allah considered the only God of Muslims, and also my past God. From their record it is established that before Islam, Allah was also the pagan god or deity.

Research shows that Allah was the moon god which the people of Quraish in Arabia, revered and worshiped. Muslims have a completely different notion of Allah. The above claim of Allah being the god of the pagan Arabs will severely hurt ordinary Muslims. They will never accept claims of many scholars, since they will not agree that their Allah, who is invisible and living above the highest heaven, was once an idol of the idolaters. I consider it true the claim by the scholars of Allah. This is because Muhammad's father's name was Abdullah (slave of Allah). Muhammad's grandfather, Abdul Muttalib (slave of Muttalib), gave this name to his son in association with one of their deities. The truth lies here, because Abu Lahab, the uncle of Muhammad and one of the sons of Abdul Muttalib, had his original name as Abdul Uzza (slave of Uzza). We know that Uzza was one of the deities of the Quraish, and this name is also mentioned in the Quran (53:19, 20). It is natural that Abdul Muttalib chose another deity (Allah) as his other son's name, Abdullah. Thus, there is no surprise that Allah was certainly one of the most esteemed deities of the Quraish, that Abdul Muttalib, the leader of the Quraish, gave this name to one of his sons. This reason prevents me from prostrating before any god that has been once an idol and later pretended to be a heavenly God. It is ridiculous to believe in the idol god, and that he could be ever a heavenly God. b) The Holy Quran Muslims believe that the Quran is the most holy, inimitable, immutable, and comprehensive Book. Every word in the Qur'an is from Allah, and no power on earth could ever change it. No book in the world, they assume, can be compared with the Quran. They think Quran is the book of justice and salvation of all problems. Its words are absolute, current, and are intact in the same way as it was revealed by divine message 1400 years ago. No one has the possession and power to change or erase its words or chapters because of the challenge of Allah (17:88). Let us now discuss how the challenge of Allah, the Al-mighty, was countered by his own abrogated verses. There are strong evidences in Sahih Bukhari and Tirmizi that Allah could not honor his own words; because Allah had to replace his immutable, divine, and most wise verses with other verses, or in many cases canceled them. My question is: "Why Allah, the wisest creator, needed to supersede his own verses? Why did he forget the previous verses?" Muslims' answer to this question is: "Because circumstances were changing through the period of revelations. It was necessary for a few verses to be abrogated, and a few to be replaced." To counter, the next question I have is: "Why is it that those circumstances changed for only 23 years, in the life span of Muhammad, after he had claimed to be the prophet?" Circumstances always change. Don't Muslims think that circumstances also changed after 632 AD, till 2009, and will continue to change in the future? What shall we do now? Who will now abrogate such verses that clash with the present and will in the future? When we raise such questions the response from the Muslims is complete silence. Another solid evidence by Muslim historians bear witness that the challenge of Allah was also turned down by his own devout follower Uthman bin Affan. Islamic history tells us that to prevent the misconceptions, variations and errors propagated by various groups of Muslims, Uthman, the third Caliph of Islam, burned the original text of the Holy Qur'an, keeping only the compilation ordered by him. Islamic historians write that, because of the uniformity in eloquence in rhetoric in Arabic among the tribes in Arabia, Islam was spreading rapidly worldwide. To clear all misconceptions among Muslims, and to save the Ummah, therefore, Caliph Uthman made copies of his version of the Quran and sent them to several regions We may ask why did not Allah reveal his verses in the same eloquence that are found today? Who gave authority to Uthman to burn the original Quran and to compile a new version? It is also very interesting that when Uthman was elected as the caliph of Islam, he was about 70 or 72 years old. History shows us that Uthman had close relatives who belonged to Banu Umayya. This aged man was very easy to be tricked and manipulated. On the other hand, Amir Muaweeya, the son of Abu Suffian, was the governor of Syria. Islamic historians agree that on the day of conquest of Mecca, after Muhammad broke all the idols in front of the Quraish, many infidels among Abu Suffian and Amir Muaweeya embraced Islam, either by heart or by force. My conjecture is that Muaweeya and Abu Suffian never accepted Islam by heart, because they had no other option but to accept Islam. Thus, during the caliphate of Uthman, when Muaweeya was enjoying the governorship of Syria, he was very well aware that the old man Uthman cannot establish laws on his own. Uthman had to depend on his allies and kinsmen. Muaweeya had never forgotten his fellowmen, who were killed by the Muslims, and the desecration of their sacred idols by Muhammad. I think Muaweeya had been carrying this grudge against Islam since that day. Elected as the governor of Syria, he was desperately waiting for the precise time to avenge the humiliation of his idols in the hands of the Muslims. Therefore, it is quite natural to think that it was Muaweeya, in the background, who had urged Uthman, to burn the original Quran. The Sahabas (companions of Muhammad) also played an important role to preserve the Quran. Muslims claim that, many Sahabas, with their incredible memory, retained the Qur'an in their hearts: the divine verses were untouchable, and protected from the attack of infidels and outsiders. Most parts of the Quran, according to Muslims, were revealed in Mecca, before Muhammad's migration to Medina. In the initial stages of revelation, vine or wine was not considered as the act of Satan. We can easily assume that drinking alcohol was not a problem in the early age of Qur'anic revelations. So, why later, Muhammad or Allah developed a great dislike for alcohol or vine? Even Muslims in Pakistan claim that Muhammad banned alcohol, because some Sahabas, including Ali (the cousin and son in law of Muhammad) while in the state of drunkenness during prayer, uttered some inappropriate words that were not in conformity with Islam. So, it is logical to think that those Sahabas (companions of Muhammad) who routinely drank alcoholic drinks did not deliver the divine messages properly. During the state of drunkenness they might have recited many verses differently from what Muhammad had revealed to them. Realizing this, the wisest and the mightiest Allah authorized Muhammad to abrogate and alter verses at his whims and fancies. Thus, we can say that not only many verses of the Qur'an had been abrogated, but many more verses have been changed by those who were routinely vine drinkers. Islamic history tells us about Abdullah bin Sa'd, one of the scribes of Muhammad from Mecca. After Muhammad migrated to Medina he retained Abdullah to write the Quranic verses as dictated to Muhammad by Allah. During a divine inspiration session Abdullah discovered the fraudulency of Muhammad, and hastily returned to Mecca. Abdullah was convinced that Muhammad was an imposter, that Allah had never sent any divine messages to Muhammad. Muhammad never forgave Abdullah. When Muhammad invaded Mecca he ordered Abdullah bin Sa'd be killed, along with other pagans who had annoyed Muhammad in the past.

We may wonder why a person, who was the writer of divine law and sacred verses, had to be killed by the Prophet of Islam. According to various sources, Abdullah bin Sa'd was a wise and knowledgeable man in Mecca. It was his habit, whenever prophet of Islam asked him to write such verse on anything, he, with his wisdom, knowledge, and ability used to tell Muhammad that the verses should be written in the exact form that Allah had revealed to Muhammad. Regardless, Muhammad gave importance to the wisdom of Abdullah bin Sa'd over to the wisdom of Almighty Allah. That was why, when Muhammad was in power, on the day of conquest of Mecca, he wanted him to be killed. It was Abdullah bin Sa'd's good luck that. Uthman b. Affan saved his life, because Uthman was Abdullah's foster brother. Thus, we may conclude that a talented man, with profound intellect, imagination and ability had constructed the Qur'an. Contradictions in the Holy Quran, is another lengthy topic which I do not wish to discuss in this article. Suffice it to say, numerous contradictions in the verses of the Holy Quran have been discovered and many will be found in the future. c) The character of the Holy Prophet of Islam and his deedsMuslims present the character of Muhammad as exemplary. He is considered the most honest, pious, humble, incorruptible, righteous, balanced, genius, and Rehmat ulil Alimeen (a mercy for whole Universe)...and so on-it is an endless list. Let us discuss a few outstanding characters and deeds of Muhammad sourced from impeccable Islamic sources, such as Ahadith (Muhammad's traditions) and Sira (Muhammad's biography).

(1) Muhammad, Aisha and their dating: Muhammad's first wife was Khadija, an influential and rich trader of Mecca. It is true that Muhammad did not marry any other women until Khadija's death. He was very devoted to her through the rest of her life. She was considered a rich woman in the Quraish tribe. She died around 619 CE. Immediately after Khadija's death, Muhammad started a chain of marriages. For a start, he married Aisha, the daughter of Abu Bakr, the first caliph of Islam, Narrations from Sahih Bukhari, the most authentic hadith compilation, gives us evidence that Aisha was only six years old when Muhammad, 50 or 51 years old, married her. When Aisha became nine years old she consummated her first night with her husband Muhammad, who was 53 or 54 then. Was it a love affair between Aisha and Muhammad? Muslims claim that, when Aisha, a nine- year-old girl consummated her first night with Muhammad, she had already attained puberty. But this claim is baseless and week, because many traditions from different Ahadith prove that after consummation of her first night with Muhammad, Aisha still played with her dolls. We know that a girl, shortly before her puberty, will quit playing with dolls, otherwise she is considered a retard. Today, this kind of marriage with forty to or fifty years of age difference is considered highly contemptible and condemnable, especially in Western countries. Even in Islamic Republic of Pakistan, parents would not give their six or nine-year-old daughters in the hands of a fifty plus-year-old man. This tradition may still exist partially in some backward remote villages, but to the vast majority of Pakistanis this custom is not acceptable. Muslims defend by saying that this practice was followed in the primitive age in Arabia. This claim means that the Sunnah (following similar acts like that of the Prophet) to consummate marriage night with a nine-year-old girl was admirable in Muhammad's time, but in the 21st century this tradition is not a civilized way of life.

(2) Muhammad seduced by his daughter-in-law Zainab was also one of the wives of Muhammad. She was formerly married to Zaid bin Harith (adopted son of Muhammad). This relation tells us that Zainab was the daughter-in-law of Muhammad before the latter married her. The story goes that one day Muhammad tried to visit his son Zaid at his home. Zaid was not at home but Muhammad did not fail to catch a glimpse of a scantily dressed Zainab. .According to Tabari and Ibn Sa'd, the posture of a half naked Zainab highly amused or aroused Muhammad, so much so, that he started praising his Lord and mumbled some words that Allah, aware of all his intentions, could understand. Consequently, Zaid bin Harith divorced his wife Zainab ,just to pave way for Muhammad to fulfill his lust for her. On this occasion Allah revealed verse 33:37. It is clear from this verse that the companions of Muhammad in Medina objected to his act of marrying his adopted son's wife. Being an unacceptable custom among the Arabs, it was a reasonable objection. To confront this objection, however, Allah sent down divine messages in the form of warning of his wrath upon those who make trouble for his beloved prophet. The marriage between Zaid and Zainab was arranged by Muhammad himself. How come, a marriage that is convened by prophet himself was dissolved? Why Muhammad, the foreteller of the advent of Imam Mehdi and the day of judgment, did not perceive the conclusion of that marriage in the first place? Where was Allah, the knower of the past and future, who would prevent marriage between Zaid and Zainab? I know Muslims will claim that Muhammad knew only what Allah told him. This is an absurd claim; it further supports my reason to disdain Islam.

(3) Maria the Copt, sweetheart and sex slave of Muhammad: Maria, a Coptic Christian slave-girl, was another sweet heart of Muhammad. She became the sex-slave of the Prophet of Islam. According to Islamic sources, she was a very attractive young girl and she seduced Muhammad more than any of his wives. One day, Muhammad tried to send Hafsa (one of his wives) away, by telling that her father (Umar) wanted to see her. In the mean time, when Hafsa was out, Muhammad and Maria were alone in the house. This opportunity was a golden chance for Prophet of Islam to make his desire fulfilled without any disturbance. Allah was also happy, that his beloved prophet had some entertainment to ease him of his burden of the task entrusted to him for the benefit of mankind. Allah, the most wise and knower of the past and future, revealed verses to his beloved prophet to protect him and to confront the allegations from his wives. Alone with Maria, in the house of Hafsa, the Prophet of Islam started to give glad tidings to Maria that if she made the Prophet happier, Allah would make her happy too, and she will never be miserable in her life and hereafter. As Maria heard this, she smiled and looked at the Prophet. This gesture of the former filled Muhammad's heart and mind with love, passion and desire for her. Hafsa retuned, annoyed that Muhammad had told her a lie. Unnoticed by Muhammad, she entered her room and discovered a lustful Prophet of Islam deeply engaged in sex with Maria. Hafsa saw her husband in bed with a slave-girl in such a position that she, as well as the entire Muslim Ummah could ever imagine. Muhammad became scared when Hafsa shouted at the Prophet who was enjoying a young girl. He did not expect Hafsa to return so soon. While the proud young and beautiful Maria was giggling on this scene, argument started between Muhammad and Hafsa. Muhammad tried his best to assuage Hafsa and keep her mouth shut. But Hafsa, as courageous and petulant as her father (Umar), rebuked Muhammad for his evil deed. Soon, Hafsa shared this story with Aisha, and they tried to tease the prophet of Islam by saying that his mouth stank of home-made alcoholic drink. Muslims try to defend Muhammad by claiming it was the smell of honey as Muhammad loved honey. Accordingly, after this affair, Muhammad never drank honey. We should note that honey does not stink. It was, perhaps, the 'honey' that flowed between Maria's legs that might had caused Muhammad's mouth to stink.

(4) Muhammad's followers jubilation on the massacre of Banu Quraiza tribe: The plunder of Khyber and the massacre of Banu Quraiza (a Jewish tribe of Medina) is another glorious feature of Islam. Soon after the battle of the Trench in 627AD, when the Muslims took control of Medina, they annihilated the entire Banu Quraiza tribe. Amidst cheers from his fanatic followers, Muhammad beheaded all the Banu Quraiza adult men and sold their women and children as slaves to raise money to buy war implements. Without any credible evidence, Muhammad alleged that the Banu Quraiza was in conspiracy with Quraish in Mecca against the Muslims in Medina. Islamic history tells us that shortly after migrating to Medina, the Prophet of Islam and his followers adopted the way of loot and plunder of caravans of the merchants and traders. Holy Quran also depicts this abhorrent event especially in chapter 9 verse 5. These notorious behaviors of Muslims were not acceptable to some groups in Medina. Hence, they did not join Muhammad in their mission for what Allah the Al-Mighty wished. Consequently, the aggressive actions of Muslims caused the first battle of Badr in 624 AD. After this battle, the chain of other battles followed in the form of barbarism by Muslims. As stated before, soon after the battle of the Trench, Muhammad pursued the Banu Quraiza Jews, killed their men, captivated their women and children, and divided their wealth and property among the Muslims. My question is:"Why were all men and adult boys of Banu Quraiza massacred in a dreadful way? Was it because the Jews did not aid Muhammad in the battle of the Trench? Was it because they conspired with the Quraish against the prophet of Islam?" If these reasons are valid, why did not Muhammad massacre all men of the Quraish on the day of conquest of Mecca? Who were the archenemies of Islam and Muhammad? I know Muslims will simply reply that the Quraish were spared because they took pledge on the hand of Muhammad, but the Jews of Banu Quraiza did not. I consider this argument false. The reason is that the Quraish were the family members of Muhammad, whereas the Banu Quraiza Jews were not. Had the Quraish been different tribe from Muhammad, I can say with certainty that they would have met even more horrendous fate than that of what happened to the Banu Quraiza. The Quraish brought many inflictions on Muhammad and his followers before and after their migration to Medina. It is widely known that the Prophet of Islam was by nature, a vindictive person. In spite of that, Muhammad spared the Quraish. This is a glaring example of injustice of the prophet of Islam.

(5) Muhammad's confusion on facing the qiblas: Muslims claim that Kaaba (Muslim's holy shrine in Mecca) was built by Abraham (the father of Ishmael and Isaac). According to them, Allah ordered Abraham to build a house of Allah for sanctuary, and warned him against idol worshipping. Hence, today, Muslims face Kaaba during their prayers. Many Muslims in Pakistan claim that the system of five daily prayers was ordained on Muslims when Muhammad undertook the journey of Miraj (a night journey to seven skies). Before Miraj, compulsory prayers were not ordained. The source from Ibn Ishaq tells us that in the early days of Islam, Muhammad, and his handful of followers started to offer prayers facing Kaaba. Later, in Medina, the Prophet of Islam and his companions started to offer their prayers facing Masjid-e-Aqsa (a mosque of Jews in Jerusalem) abandoning Kaaba. Again, after the 18th month of migration, Allah sent his divine messages, allowing his beloved prophet to turn his face back to Kaaba. So, while Muhammad and his companions were attentive in prayers, Muhammad turned his face from Masjid Aqsa to Kaaba. We may ask: Why qiblas (facing towards shrine) were switched to Masjid-e-Aqsa and back to Kaaba if it was predestined that Abraham was the builder of Kaaba? This incidence proves that Muhammad and the Quraish never knew that Kaaba was ever built by Abraham. This is a big sin by Muhammad, because he turned his face from the shrine whose builder was Abraham. Today's Muslims should realize it that Kaaba once was an old sanctuary for idols, and the idolaters had built Kaaba.

(6) Muhammad violated the treaty of Hudabya: Apparently, the treaty of Hudaybya was a peace treaty between the Quraish of Mecca and the Muslims of Medina. Feeling homesick and nostalgic after six or seven years away from their family members in Mecca, Muslims in Medina probably were disintegrating They became tired of Muhammad's harangue and false promises of prosperity and divine bliss. They had had enough of Muhammad. Muhammad realized that to enthuse his crestfallen followers, he had to engage in warfare, to attack Mecca and take control of it. Consequently, he adopted deception and pretension to ascend to power. The treaty of Hudaibiya is an example of such trickery by Muhammad. The treaty of Hudaybya was a peace pact for the Quraish but not for Muhammad. Even before this treaty was signed Muhammad had already devised a plan to invade Mecca. Muslims claim that the Quraish violated the treaty. From Jarir Tabri resources it is clear that it was Muhammad who had violated that treaty.

My belief towards Allah, Islam, and Muhammad after being Ex-Muslim The evidences cited above shows that the prophet of Islam was a coward who always adopted a way to attack his opponent from back and kill them in ambush. To Muhammad and his Allah, every promise and word of honor was meaningless. He was the only untrustworthy Prophet in the history of mankind who could do anything, beyond the limits, to make his own created Allah happier. This prophet was indeed a miscreant, a criminal, a womanizer, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and so on.... My conclusionJust because I have left Islam does not mean I have converted to other religions like Christianity, Hinduism or Buddhism. I consider myself an atheist. To me, all religions were made by men, and I do not consider any prophet or prophets as pious and righteous. They all were myths, designed to trick and convert the gullible people. I do not believe in the hereafter or whatever has been told in ancient myths and religions. However, I still believe in reincarnation, but not in spiritual form but in genetic form. As genetics travels and will travel through generations, it is possible I may be reborn in this world, but in a different form.


  1. Do you know of any good scholarly books on Pre-Islamic Arabian religion?

  2. Hi Stacy.

    Unfortunately I am unable to find any. All records of Pre-Islamic Arabia is skewed and hidden by the "religion of peace."

  3. May Allah forgive you your sins!

    You're such a liar. Telling completely different storey about Islam

  4. Which part do you deny and why?

    You should present a counter argument to prove what is written is inaccurate otherwise you are basically supporting my view by your comment.
    If none, trolls be gone!

  5. First of all everything is a lie and who are you trying to fool?? where are the so called islamic sources that you keep mentioning about? could you care to elaborate more about where you got them from? are you a somali at all? then if you are pls remove the picture of the noble ahmed gurey from your blog for gurey was a noble muslim and he fought the christians up until his death may allah swt grant him the highest level of paradise (firdaws) ameen
    May allah swt guide you back to islam, none can defeat the deen of haq(truth) for indeed it is the religion of truth which will rule the world. Pray that Allah swt shows you his mercy and guides you to the truth because the alternative is indeed a fearful one in which you will face the wrath of Allah and whenever allah swt unleashes his wrath none shall ever escape it. Indeed you are a loser in this life and the hereafter is much worse for you and those alike who disbelieve in the words of Allah swt (the most gracious and the most merciful).

    Insulting the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is one of the worst of forbidden actions, and it constitutes kufr and apostasy from Islam, according to scholarly consensus, whether done seriously or in jest. The one who does that is to be executed even if he repents and whether he is a Muslim or a kaafir. If he repents sincerely and regrets what he has done, this repentance will benefit him on the Day of Resurrection and Allah will forgive him.

    So if you are interested in a dialogue then email me at muslimboy44@hotmail.com but you should be aware that i don't condone any act of insult against islam and prophet muhammed (peace and blessings of allah be upon him)

  6. You're demented. You're a classic example of how religion stunts one's ability to think critically. You're so sure of you "beliefs" that you have completely forgotten that they are just that; beliefs, with no factual basis at all.

    As such, these primitive superstitions have made you a mindless drone lacking common sense and even human decency and dignity.

    "Insulting the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is one of the worst of forbidden actions, and it constitutes kufr and apostasy from Islam, according to scholarly consensus, whether done seriously or in jest. The one who does that is to be executed even if he repents and whether he is a Muslim or a kaafir."

    - You can do that in Islamic nations but not in the rest of the world and that is why I am not in a Muslim country where people are murdered for believe - or lack thereof. If you are Muslim you should stay in a Muslim country no matter what like your religion commands you to or otherwise you are not a Muslim, just like me.

    If you believe in these things it's your prerogative and you should also be aware that other people have that right as well so you cannot go around and start stoning people to death and burning witches and practice other medieval rituals just because you believe in them.

    1) there is no such a thing as Allah - there has never been any prove and never will be, though violence and oppression, as is the case now in the Muslim world for coercion, are not included.

    2) everything you have said is what YOU believe and that does not make it factual nor does it make me a bad person for not believing what you believe. Our difference is that you believe something and I don't.

    3) telling you something other than what the Quran told you does not mean insulting the religion of peace. I would say that what is has done to your brain is an insult to Islam but that is another story. And why would you threaten someone with death and then invite them to debate? And how could there be a debate when you only present belief backed by threat of violence and nothing factual backed by empirical evidence? Do you know that Islam is only different from the countless other religions that have existed throughout history simply because you believe in it (Islam) and not the others?

  7. ciyaalka xafada u knw uwil b to blame if indeed there is a heaven and i dnt get in because all the thngs u write mek sense bt at da semtym it hurts knwin dat my whole lyf was based on this.....do ryt more to enlighten me in particular bro.....cheers